Using AI for content without sounding like everyone else
You can usually tell. The post is perfectly structured, grammatically flawless, and says nothing a competitor could not have said. It reads like a brochure that learned to type.
That texture is a real problem for a local business, because the entire reason someone picks you over a franchise is that you seem like people rather than a process.
Why it comes out generic
These tools produce the most probable next phrase. Averaged across everything ever written about roofing, the most probable sentence about roofing is the blandest one. Generic is not a bug in the output, it is the mathematical centre of it.
Which tells you the fix: the specifics have to come from you. The tool cannot invent what it does not know, and what it does not know is your actual work.
Feed it the things only you have
Before asking for anything, give it the raw material:
- The real question a customer asked you this week, in their words
- The street, the neighbourhood, the kind of property
- What actually went wrong on the job and how you handled it
- The number you would quote and why it is that and not lower
A post built from those details could not have been written about any other business. One built from "write about roof maintenance tips" could have been written about ten thousand.
Keep your own grammar
If you say "we will get you sorted," do not let it become "we will ensure your needs are comprehensively addressed." Those mean the same thing and only one sounds like a human being.
Give it a few paragraphs you have actually written and tell it to match that. Then read the result aloud. If you would not say it to a customer standing in front of you, cut it.
Cut the tells
A few habits give it away immediately. Strip them:
- The throat-clearing opener. "In today's fast-paced world." Delete the first sentence; the second one is usually the real start.
- Lists of three balanced adjectives. Reliable, professional, affordable. Pick one and prove it.
- Hedging. "May help to potentially improve." Say whether it works or do not mention it.
- The summary paragraph. Nobody reading a 200-word post needs it recapped.
Never let it invent a fact
This is the one that gets businesses in trouble. It will happily produce a statistic, a percentage, a "studies show" that nothing supports, and it will sound authoritative.
If you publish an invented number you are responsible for it, not the tool. Every figure in your content should be one you can point at a source for, or one from your own books.
Write with it the way you would work with a fast, confident intern who has never visited your job site. Useful for drafting. Never the final word on anything factual.
The test that matters
Read the finished piece and ask whether a competitor two towns over could publish it word for word by swapping the business name.
If they could, it is not content. It is filler, and the time you saved writing it was wasted anyway.